![]() ![]() Our country shifted in unexpected, unimaginable ways, making this film seem even more powerful-and yes, important. I want more from a movie than a compelling subject explored in a standard way.įor better or worse, Spotlight is one of these films with a cause célèbre, but a strange thing has happened in the handful of years since this movie debuted. Subject matter is critical to Academy voters and filmgoers, as it should be, but when it overshadows quality as a “fast pass” to acclaim, I have an adverse reaction. It’s as if the gesture of visibility alone elevates its status to “significant” just by mentioning it. The typically shallow “Who are you wearing?” has been replaced or embellished with the equally hollow “What cause are you representing?” I take nothing away from these important issues, but I grow tired of the Academy mistaking their awards ceremony for a political caucus, particularly when the film in question depicts a worthy topic in a straightforward, serviceable fashion. You can hear it reflected in the red-carpet banter before the Oscar telecast begins. They aren’t bad pictures, but the issue alone is the “wow” factor. No expert craftsmanship or unusual artistry, in other words. They present urgent concerns, to be sure, but offer little else that is memorable. ![]() The Motion Picture Academy has been on an extended crusade of late, selecting movies that feature relevant, trending causes for their top award even if the films themselves aren’t all that remarkable in other respects. I thought the film was good back then, but it was another “issue” picture, and that irritated me. During those halcyon days of 2015, we were living in a different country, or so it seemed. Although it’s a recent winner, Spotlight‘s impression on me has improved with age. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |